Is there really a noticeable change between 128 Kbps and 320 Kbps? I like 320 Kbps better because when you switch them to audio to burn a CD or something it has less quality loss, but when you're listening to the mp3, the difference in quality is so not noticeable for the human ear.
I mean, anything less than 128 Kbps does sound like shit. But 128 and upwards it's all the same for the human ear (unless you're using a super expensive hi-fi and the loudest volume possible so you can hear some noise in the background...)
Mmm, don't mind me. The "The only version I had of this was 128 kbps and it sucked so badly" just made me raise my eyebrows. No offense intended.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
ninetydegrees
no subject
on 2006-03-25 03:28 pm (UTC)I mean, anything less than 128 Kbps does sound like shit. But 128 and upwards it's all the same for the human ear (unless you're using a super expensive hi-fi and the loudest volume possible so you can hear some noise in the background...)
Mmm, don't mind me. The "The only version I had of this was 128 kbps and it sucked so badly" just made me raise my eyebrows. No offense intended.